| Predatory franchise corporations such as Starbucks,move
into a market built by local people, force a split in the revenue
locallly and hasten the eventual collapse of the local business that
cannot afford to share the market with the interloper's deep pockets. |
|
| |
 |
 What's wrong with Starbucks?
Chris Carris, owner of the Willow Glen Coffee Roasting Company in Willow
Glen, said he lost 40 percent of his business when Starbucks moved
in across the street. "They're like a strip mining operation,"
he said. "My business is slow. I'm still making money, but it
always could be better."
Carris said that deep corporate pockets make it impossible for him
to compete with Starbucks head-to-head. "They use predatory marketing
techniques," he said. "You won't beat them on advertising.
You won't beat them on placement. They can support and subsidize a
store that
can't do well. Now they've got three stores within a three-mile radius."
|
 |
Public
Outcry
In response to public outcry against the movement
of Starbucks and other chains like Blockbuster Video and the Gap into
neighbourhoods, city officials in San Francisco are devising what they
call a "neighbourhood preservation package." The city believes
that because chains are able to bid up rents, they threaten to drive
out mom-and-pop businesses and destroy San Francisco's famed unique
neighbourhoods. article > |
 |
 Starbucks
Crushes "Mom n Pop Shops"
by Any and All Means
Starbucks is a predatory multinational corporation that has destroyed
cultural diversity, resisted unionizing Starbucks is in the habit of roasting
smaller cafes by paying big money for their choice locations. article
>
|
 |
Predatory Behavior
Dollars spent at Starbucks are not spent at a local business. Money given to such places
does not stay in the local economy - profits go back to the corporate
office. Does this sound like an attractive future for this community?
Predatory behavior in common with that of franchise corporations such as Starbucks,
which move into a market built by local people, forcing a split in the
revenue and the eventual collapse of the local business that cannot afford
to share the market with the interloper's deep pockets. |
 |
For
the independent cafe, Starbucks spells doom...
Starbucks openings from coast to coast have sometimes signaled the death knell for
the mom-and-pop shop. In cities as diverse as Milwaikee, New Orleans and
Portland, Ore., a beloved gourmet coffee house disappeared soon after
a Starbucks moved in close by.
And when Starbucks eyed Saratoga Springs, N.Y., it offered to buy Madeline's
Espresso Bar. After the two sides couldn't agree on a price, Starbucks
opened across the street.
One these coffee battle grounds, the independent cafe closed or moved.
article > |
 |
Say No To Starbucks |
|
|
- Starbucks is spreading corporate monoculture around the world,
threatening cultural diversity.
- Starbucks promotes predatory business practices, squeezing out independent shops article >
|
|
 |
A corporation bent on becoming a global
powerhouse
Now, Starbucks
is waking up to the grande challenges faced by any corporation bent on
becoming a global powerhouse. The stores may be oases of tranquility,
but management's expansion tactics are something else. Take what critics
call its "predatory real estate" strategy--paying more than
market-rate rents to keep competitors out of a location.
Still, the
company's strategy could backfire. Not only will neighborhood activists
and local businesses increasingly resent the tactics, but customers
could also grow annoyed over having fewer choices.article >
|
|
|
| |