|
(toggle submenus)
|
 |
Life-shattering power wielded
by the government...
|
|
 |
Economic development alone
can justify the demolition of a perfectly good neighborhood
|
|
| |
Despotism in New London
Life-shattering power wielded by the government By George F. Will - Washington Post #913E03
The Fifth
Amendment says, among other things: "nor shall private property
be taken for public use, without just compensation"
(emphasis added). Every state constitution also stipulates takings only
for "public use." The framers of the Bill of Rights used language
carefully; clearly they intended the adjective "public" to
restrict government takings to uses that are directly owned or primarily
used by
the general public, such as roads, bridges or public buildings. full
article > |
 |
|
 |
Fort
Trumbull development area, New London, CT
aerial photography by Roger Riley {Riley Photographics}
|
|
The hard rains started falling in 2000 in New London. CT...
Confiscate land and charge back rent for the years the owners fought confiscation.
After
the completion of the case, the city expects to receive retroactive "use and occupancy" payments (also known as "rent")
from the residents. (!#@!)
In
the letter, lawyers argued that because the takeover took place
in 2000, the residents had been living on city property for nearly
five years, and would therefore owe rent for the duration of their
stay at the close of the trial. Any money made from tenants (for
some residents, their only form of income) would also have to be
paid to the city.
|
|
|
This
Land is Our Land
[These days it seems,] economic development alone could justify
the demolition of a perfectly good neighborhood, especially when
so many residents wanted to stay. Iif private property can be
taken away simply because another party thinks it can generate
even more revenue from it, then no one's property would be safe.
full article >
|
|
|
|